Friday, March 13, 2009

Democrats Whine About Republican Opposition

Give me a Break, the Democrats launched the most nihilistic campaign against George Bush in the history of Congress, from blocking judges killing any attempt at reform, and saying no to funding troops in Iraq. In the real world Speaker Pelosi and Reid have blocked GOP attempts to offer alternative packages, but never let a fact get in the way of a good storyline.

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Democrats are not letting up in what has been a constant stream criticism in recent weeks of Republicans as obstructionist at a time of national economic crisis.

The Democratic National Committee rolled out a new Web site Friday that features the party’s “Party of No” clock. The clock spotlights the amount of time that has passed since the release of President Obama’s 2010 budget blueprint – all time the DNC argues that Republicans have spent offering only criticism of rather than alternatives to the White House’s budgetary plan.

“Instead of petty politics and empty obstructionism, Republicans in Congress should either support the President’s budget or present their own plan to create jobs, fix our schools, reform our health care system, and make America energy independent,” DNC Communications Director Brad Woodhouse said in the statement.


What a bunch of phonies!

3 comments:

  1. all time the DNC argues that Republicans have spent offering only criticism of rather than alternatives to the White House’s budgetary plan

    It would take more work, but that's what some enterprising Republican congressman should do, develop an alternative budget to counter the democrats' porkulus bill.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pelosi wouldn't allow it to be voted on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dems, guess what: this is still a democratic republic...debate is healthy.

    "Republicans have spent offering only criticism of rather than alternatives..."

    Uh..yes they have offered alternatives. Their ideas aren't quite as blatantly Marxist as the dems' ideas, but they are legitimate ideas none the less.

    ReplyDelete