Saturday, April 25, 2009

Porter Goss: Pelosi a Liar

We Know!.


Porter Goss from the WaPo-Since leaving my post as CIA director almost three years ago, I have remained largely silent on the public stage. I am speaking out now because I feel our government has crossed the red line between properly protecting our national security and trying to gain partisan political advantage. We can't have a secret intelligence service if we keep giving away all the secrets. Americans have to decide now. A disturbing epidemic of amnesia seems to be plaguing my former colleagues on Capitol Hill. After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, members of the committees charged with overseeing our nation's intelligence services had no higher priority than stopping al-Qaeda. In the fall of 2002, while I was chairman of the House intelligence committee, senior members of Congress were briefed on the CIA's "High Value Terrorist Program," including the development of "enhanced interrogation techniques" and what those techniques were. This was not a one-time briefing but an ongoing subject with lots of back and forth between those members and the briefers.


More:

Let me be clear. It is my recollection that:

-- The chairs and the ranking minority members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, known as the Gang of Four, were briefed that the CIA was holding and interrogating high-value terrorists.

-- We understood what the CIA was doing.

-- We gave the CIA our bipartisan support.

-- We gave the CIA funding to carry out its activities.

-- On a bipartisan basis, we asked if the CIA needed more support from Congress to carry out its mission against al-Qaeda.

I do not recall a single objection from my colleagues. They did not vote to stop authorizing CIA funding. And for those who now reveal filed "memorandums for the record" suggesting concern, real concern should have been expressed immediately -- to the committee chairs, the briefers, the House speaker or minority leader, the CIA director or the president's national security adviser -- and not quietly filed away in case the day came when the political winds shifted. And shifted they have.

I wrote this at the beginning of the week:

I suspect that many Democrats are terrified of a true investigation as their role in approving and their knowledge of interrogation techniques will be exposed. Imagine Pelosi explaining, yeah I knew about this stuff while under deposition from someone like Mark Levin! Levin himself announced yesterday on the radio that he would provide all the support possible as well represent anyone Obama decides to scapegoat. Imagine that!





3 comments:

  1. Ok, first the Republicans say we can't release details of torture because of security concerns. Now the Republicans say the administration didn't release enough details that show torture worked. Now the Republicans are saying the Democrats should take care because they could be implicated along with the Republicans.

    These are all weak arguments. Torture is illegal is immoral. How Americans are not concerned about this is beyond me. Our rights are being eroded away. We have lost habeus corpus, the government can monitor our activities without warrent, and, in the name of national security, the government has the right to torture anyone, including American citizens.

    Outragious. I don't care who goes down for this. I want my rights restored.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, members of the committees charged with overseeing our nation's intelligence services had no higher priority than stopping al-Qaeda."

    Wrong, Porter. Your highest priority was protecting and defending our constitution. You failed, because you violated our laws. Regardless of whether you feel torture would be effective (it clearly wasn't, according to our country's best interrogators), it was AGAINST THE LAW at the time you authorized torture. If you wanted the law changed, you could have lobbied congress. You didn't. You simply violated the law. You doubly failed because it is now obvious that waterboarding was used in an attempt to extract false information: The main questions asked during the waterboarding were about connections between Iraq and Al Qaeda -- connections which the CIA already knew did NOT exist.

    ReplyDelete
  3. anonymous
    don't plagiarize Maureen Dowd.

    ReplyDelete