He was accused of being a crook and tried to appease North Korea, the combination of both ended up destroying him.
SEOUL (Reuters) - South Korea's former President Roh Moo-hyun, hounded for weeks over his links while in office to a widening corruption scandal, appears to have jumped to his death in the mountains near his home on Saturday, a top aide said.Local media quoted a note left by Roh which seemed to confirm his intention to commit suicide, asking for his body to be cremated and saying "the rest of my life would only be a burden for others."
The likelihood of suicide could boost public sympathy for opponents of his conservative successor President Lee Myung-bak, whose hard-line policies have largely overturned the more accommodating approach of Roh in key areas such as dealings with prickly North Korea and strike-prone labor unions.
"Former President Roh left his house at 5:45 a.m. and while hiking on the Ponghwa Mountain, appears to have jumped off a rock at around 6:40 a.m.," Moon Jae-in, who was Roh's presidential chief of staff, said in a nationally televised statement.
The 62-year old former human rights lawyer, whose five-year term ended in February 2008, had recently become embroiled in a mounting graft inquiry, the result of confessions by a wealthy shoe manufacturer that he had bribed dozens of officials and politicians, as well as Roh's wife when she was First Lady.
"This is a truly unbelievable, lamentable and deeply sad event," President Lee said in a statement issued by the presidential Blue House.
My sympathy to the family. Its sad, because the North Korean tyrant who killed hundreds of thousands sits happily in power drinking his Scotch and causing trouble, while a person who reached out in good faith to him is now dead. I have no sympathy for the presidents alleged corruption and I scoff at the notion they could work with North Korea, but he surly he deserved a batter fate then this.

The Times on what happened:
President Lee Myung-bak, Mr. Roh’s successor, found the news “difficult to believe,” his office said.
Mr. Roh, who had prided himself on being a clean politician during his term from 2003 to 2008, was questioned for 10 hours on April 30 by state prosecutors over his alleged involvement in a corruption scandal that has already landed some of his relatives and aides in jail.
“I can’t look you in the face because of shame,” Mr. Roh told reporters before he presented himself for questioning by prosecutors in Seoul, who had accused him of taking $6 million in bribes from a businessman while in office. “I apologize for disappointing the people.”
In his last posting on his Web site, on April 22, he wrote, “You should now discard me.”
He added: “I no longer symbolize the values you pursue. I am no longer qualified to speak for such things as democracy, progressiveness and justice.”
His apology was typical for a South Korean politician, who is expected to take moral responsibility for a corruption scandal that implicated aides and relatives, even if Mr. Roh denied most of the bribery allegations against him. But prosecutors had been considering indicting him on bribery charges.
In recent weeks, several of his aides and relatives had been arrested or questioned on charges of taking bribes. His elder brother also was arrested in December on bribery charges.
Prosecutors suspected that Mr. Roh, while president, solicited a total of $6 million from a shoe manufacturer, payments that are alleged to have been made to his wife, his son and his brother’s son-in-law. Both his wife and son have been questioned by the prosecutors.
The Economist on The President:His term as president was tumultuous. The business community saw him as a leftist maverick intent on re-distributing wealth by imposing progressive taxes. At one point he was impeached, accused of corruption, although he was not convicted.
Mr Roh, troubled by abuse of the highest office by his predecessors, sought to institute more checks and balances on the president and more forms of oversight. He continued the “Sunshine Policy” of Kim Dae-jung, which called for engagement of North Korea. He sought to deepen social, political and economic contacts with Pyongyang, the Northern capital, to the disquiet of Washington. Meetings with the American leader were never relaxed, and although a free-trade agreement was signed between the two countries, and despite the presence of many American troops in South Korea, the alliance grew testy. In October 2007 Mr Roh went to Pyongyang, against the advice of George Bush’s White House. North Korea had exploded a nuclear bomb in 2006 and Washington did not want its ally shaking hands or signing agreements with the Northern dictator, Kim Jong-il.
Mr Roh’s efforts while in office to re-distribute wealth were reversed by his successor, Lee Myung-bak, a former boss of the Hyundai Group. Mr Lee has also cooled relations with North Korea. South Korean tourist groups no longer travel across the heavily armed inter-Korean border. The future of the Kaesong Industrial Complex in North Korea, a joint venture between southern capital and northern labour, is in doubt following a series of capricious demands by Pyongyang. North Korea has said it will not return to six-party talks on ending its nuclear-weapons programme.
In his retirement Mr Roh criticised his successor’s policies towards North Korea. At his village he began to reclaim some of his former popularity. His home become popular among tourists and the former president would often greet holidaymakers at his front gate. But in April, on his website under the heading, “I Apologise”, Mr Roh said that he had requested, received and used money from a businessman. He said that he had a “debt to repay”. Mr Roh may have accepted at least $6m and numerous gifts through family members and former aides. In time his reputation may recover somewhat, but locals are unimpressed. ”Before this incident I thought he was a clean president and I respected him. I have changed my mind”, says Park Song-deuk, a resident of Mr Roh’s village.
t
I think honor is more important, however when corruption is present sometimes this is the only avenue. Pelosi, Reed, Frank's, Dodd should learn from him, and follow his lead.
ReplyDeleteMaybe he was assassinated and it was all a plot to remove conservatives and install socialists in South Korea. Whenever a person who is critical to some political movement advancing or no "commits suicide" - one must wonder if he was "suicided". I take note that the politician said it was "difficult to believe". It does appear he was on record expressing shame and self-loathing. So, perhaps it was a real suicide. Anyway, that businessman sought to corrupt him. So the businessman is just as guilty and I hope he is brought to justice.
ReplyDeleteThere must have been strong good about this man - that was corrupted - or else he would have been like our politicians and felt no shame.
Grace I believe it was a suicide, anonymous I disagree adamantly.
ReplyDeleteI see no reason or evidence for this to be seen in any way as a conspiracy, especially by socialists, considering President Roh was much further left-leaning than the current South Korean prez.
ReplyDeleteAlso, honorable suicide has a long history in East Asia. China, Japan and Korea all have many instances where people have committed suicide to escape shame or dishonor.
as a korean, difficult to believe that it was a suicide just because of the way korean men are built. they are mentally tough and stubborn good or bad. i did not agree with him all of the time, but i did respect him for his stance against the american government and his efforts in improving relations with the north. you have to fully understand the truth about korean history from a korean's point of view. there is a lot of ugly, what the americans and japanese did in korea and still do today. if it was suicide, then i do not feel sorry for him nor do i feel that he was victimized. he knew full well what he was getting into. korea is a very complex nation. his suicide was well timed and planned out. rather than have his family and friends dragged through the mud, he chose the easier exit. and if his predictions were right, then he would leave a legacy of change and clean politics except for a slight slip that no one would really know the truth about. more importantly, he would die a martyr. so far his plan is working. any other suicide does not make sense considering that this man has had a clear objective his whole life. a suicide just because he could no longer handle the pressure, or to be honorable---hard to believe. not noh.
ReplyDeletePresident Roh is a man of HONOR. I do not know if he is guilty of the things he is being accused of...but if he was, he has shown the greatest remorse by this action and completely reclaimed his honor. I only wish the politicians in my country were capable of feeling such shame and remorse. Unfortunately the politicians in my country are shameless pigs, who keep doing corrupt things even after they have been found out or accused of corruption. If only more politicians are like Mr. Roh, the world would be a better place!
ReplyDeletegive me break. this man was a communist sympathizing liberal dolt. not a man of honor! he took money! not just that, but he basically killed a man by accusing him in the press in order to get revenge. that man later commited suicide too! what kind of man of honor acts like this? what has his stupid sunshine policy accomplished? let's see... ICBMs, an Arsenal of nukes... give me a freaking break. his policies enabled the north gain ground. the cost of living increased under him... korea fell out of the g-10...
ReplyDeletethis guy is an ideologue who loves the touchy feely leftist ideals... but who doesn't understand that in the real world, you can't just hug everyone into prosperity.
his sympathizers in the south and the north organized the mad cow conspiracy to destroy 2mb. 2mb is probably corrupt as well. but by fuck, he know's how to make money. if they just left him the fuck a lone, koreans would be more prosperous today.
This is disturbing and eye opening at the same time. A man who would commit suicide for an allegation against his name, it just baffles the mind.
ReplyDeleteBy Mr. Roh's standards, India would have no politicians. Everyone is corrupt here. Still they are allowed to hold office.
Hope his soul rests in peace.
N